Kansas City Royals vs Minnesota Twins · All-Time
131 meetings tracked · closing-line graded
RECORD
58-73
MEETINGS
131
ATS
33-35
O / U
26-40
Key Insights
- ▸Minnesota Twins lead 73-58 across 131 tracked meetings.
- ▸Games have averaged 8.8 combined points.
- ▸Minnesota Twins have been the better ATS side (35-33).
- ▸Strong Under trend: 26-40 O/U.
Year-by-Year Record
| Season | Games | Kansas City Royals | Minnesota Twins | ATS | O / U | Avg Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 7-3 | 3-7 | 8.2 |
| 2025 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 5-8 | 3-10 | 6.1 |
| 2024 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 8-5 | 5-8 | 8.0 |
| 2023 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 4-9 | 7-5 | 8.9 |
| 2022 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 9-10 | 8-10 | 7.6 |
| 2021 | 12 | 6 | 6 | — | — | 10.7 |
| 2020 | 10 | 5 | 5 | — | — | 7.6 |
| 2019 | 19 | 5 | 14 | — | — | 10.5 |
| 2018 | 19 | 10 | 9 | — | — | 10.3 |
Ask Optimus about Kansas City Royals vs Minnesota Twins
Pick a starter or type your own. First query is free.
More from this matchup
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Kansas City Royals vs Minnesota Twins record all-time?▾
Across 131 all-time meetings, the Minnesota Twins lead the series 73-58.
What is the ATS trend in Kansas City Royals vs Minnesota Twins games?▾
ATS: Kansas City Royals are 33-35 vs the spread in these matchups. Minnesota Twins are 35-33.
Do Kansas City Royals vs Minnesota Twins games go over or under?▾
Over/under: games between Kansas City Royals and Minnesota Twins have gone over 26 times and under 40 times, with an average combined score of 8.8.
When did Kansas City Royals and Minnesota Twins last play?▾
See Last Meetings section for detailed score, spread, and total data from the most recent Kansas City Royals vs Minnesota Twins games.
Where can I see the 5-year Kansas City Royals vs Minnesota Twins history?▾
A 5-year head-to-head page tracks every Kansas City Royals vs Minnesota Twins meeting from the last five full seasons. Link at the bottom of this page.
Data coverage: Trendline's head-to-head records include closing-line-graded games from 2018–2026. Older meetings aren't in this dataset yet.